Less is not more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mary had a bathing suit on
When I go through the glossy pages of top notch magazines as I enjoy the photo memories of A-Class events it often befuddles me why there is this craze for less is more fashion statement for Sista’s. Most times, these events are held in 5-Star rated venues that ensure that their Air conditioning system surpasses that of a morgue. Why would one dress so as to enjoy a party and ultimately catch a chill? What is even more befuddling is the fact that not every Sista attends these events with a guy in tow as a date. I wonder how my lovely Sista’s are able to go home in the full glare of the world in something as fashionable as a shawl (only) without a man’s shoulders to dignify the dressing to some extent.
The blame list goes on and on but the fact remains that less especially in dressing is not the all new sexy! Photo Credits: HereTake charge! My name is Blossom of the blcompère brand. I am a soon to be published Author, a certified Blogger and an amazing Compère and most recently, a lousy Designer... as simple as A. B. C. D.
CLICK HERE to connect with me.
|
Comments
I get the need to cover up, the need for decency.
But usually, when fashionista's say less is more they mean less accessories. Not the pantyhose and the jacket and the huge necklace and the chandelier earrings and hat and sunglasses and shiny stilettos all at once.
Sometimes less is more. No huge bulky train, even a shorter length. When I have a bad week, I like to go out on the weekend in a short dress that would make everyone stare, it assures me that I'm attractive. I don't think I would ever need the shoulders of any man to "dignify" my dressing. Even in my nakedness, I will choose to hold my head high. Like Bree Van De Kamp. Regardless of situations. Or my short slutty dress.
I also themed my post not to be a display of not knowing what "Less is more" means in the fashion world. It is an intentional theme to catch attention.
Thank you dearest.
RSS feed for comments to this post